This is really something new, they can quietly get to a foreign country and destroy it before it has time to answer their nuclear weapons. Stealth technology makes nuclear arsenal means for victory in a nuclear war and not for peace under the doctrine of "mutually assured destruction." So, President Obama is now convinced EU leaders to join his plan to create a way for pre-emptive nuclear strike that could completely remove Russia from the global arena.
As I have noted, the IMF fully supports his ideas. May 1, the day before the massacre in Odessa - a city in southern Ukraine, where the May 2 killing many supporters of independence - Fund said Ukrainian authorities that if all the supporters of independence in the southern and eastern regions of the country will not be defeated and / or destroyed, he put on the cross Kiev and force it into bankruptcy.
Obama is clearly not joking. Given us to power in Kiev government is now bombing south-eastern Ukraine to convince its citizens that resistance is futile.
One of the purposes of this short-term - to force Russia to accept the loss and do not require the payment of Ukrainian debts to Ukraine was able to pay its debts to the IMF's more, the U.S. and the EU.
In fact, before us - an international bankruptcy procedure, but instead of court resources used by the military. Imagine that lenders come to the bankrupt for the benefit - but the money gets only one who has the most "trunks".
That is why the IMF ordered Kiev deal with the rebellion in the south-east.
Fund is important, not the earth, and the Kiev government control over the assets in the rebellious part of the country. With the privatization or sale to pay off debt, these assets will be worth something. However, for the preservation of the dominant role of the Obama dollar is more important than the Ukrainian debt - because it requires Wall Street.
The fact that the U.S. now preparing a nuclear attack on Russia, still indicates a number of grounds. May 23 published an article "U.S. is experiencing a new missile for missile defense, NATO» (US Tests Advanced Missile For NATO Interceptor System).
June 10 online with good sources in the Russian intelligence material appeared stating that the Ukrainian president Peter "Poroshenko met secretly with ... U.S. delegation led by Director ... Natsinalnoy secret service CIA operations Archibald Frank (Frank Archibald). The delegation also included the former head of the CIA station in Ukraine Jeffrey Egan (Jeffrey Egan), the acting head of the residency Raymond Mark Davidson (Raymond Mark Davidson), Mark Buggy (Mark Buggy) (CIA, Istanbul), a CIA agent in the Polish intelligence service Andrzej Derlatka (Andrzej Derlatka) and CIA officer Kevin Duffin (Kevin Duffin), who is now senior vice president of the insurance company Brower.
Poroshenko and Archibald signed a document entitled "Agreement on military cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine. '"
It is also worth noting that just a month before the CIA and the State Department have overthrown the previous, pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, the Dutch government after 18 years of hesitation decided to allow the U.S. to equip our F-35 bombers based in the Netherlands, nuclear bombs.
Before that, in November, the Dutch parliament "approved the government's plan to purchase 37 F-35A to replace the obsolete nuclear bombers F-16. Rumored to be in the Netherlands at the airbase "Volkel" placed - in accordance with the policy of the NATO nuclear sharing the burden - about two dozen U.S. nuclear gravity bombs B-61. "
At the same time, Obama not only increases our capacity for preventive nuclear strike, but creates something new - the initiative "Prompt Global Strike", which should complement our nuclear forces "accurate non-nuclear weapons" capable, if the attack will be carried out from the territory of neighboring with Russia Ukraine destroy Russian nuclear weapons in a few minutes.
Perhaps it will be for Obama fallback in the event that if the Europeans (except the Netherlands and another two or three countries) refuse to participate in a nuclear attack on Russia.
Obama, of course, set up in earnest, but the question of whether he can make the leaders of other "democratic" states to agree to his plan first strike, remains open.
The two most likely things that can stop it at this stage - it's either a split in NATO, or Putin's decision to accept the domestic political consequences and did not respond to our challenge.
Putin can come to the conclusion that it's better for a while compatriots consider him "wimp" than all his country perish with him. In turn, if Obama is too hard to play their "superpower" trumps this conflict it can compromise even stronger than Putin.
In the end, this kind of thing is clearly not improve its image in the history books - of course, if it cares. However, it can be quite satisfied with Obama if he will be remembered as the second George W. Bush - only better with the gift of gab.
Be that as it may, if it comes to a nuclear attack, this "victory" Obama will destroy the reputation of another rather than "victory" in Iraq has destroyed the reputation of its predecessor.
Probably even the Americans, ultimately find that Bush was not the worst president in the history of our country. Who said that the second half of the Bush-Obama can not be on the basis of the first even worse? Original publication: Indications that the US Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia Yu Klimov
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий